Kagoya是日本少数支付境外用户购买的VPS商家,基于OpenVZ技术。今天购买了Kagoya 1G方案(最低套餐)的VPS,价格为840日元,折合人民币56元左右。配置是3核、1G内存(Burst到2G),200G硬盘。以下是一些测试数据:
1,PING测试
全国范围有不同程度的掉包,甚至从美国、香港PING过去依然会掉包。看来线路的确很烂。
补充:晚上19:30再次测试了一下,北京电信PING值高达300-500ms。
2,网络、硬盘测试
网络非常一般,硬盘灰常给力!
[root@v3818 ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2013-10-02 15:50:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.test”
[=====================================>] 104,857,600 1.16M/s in 86s
2013-10-02 15:51:54 (1.16 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]
[root@v3818 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.20731 s, 255 MB/s
[root@v3818 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.44493 s, 110 MB/s
值得说明的是,官网的方案里标明的硬盘是200G,但这里检测到的是1TB。查了一下官网,意思是说,如果超出了200GB,需要支持4.2日元/天/10G的费用。
[root@v3818 ~]# df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs simfs 1000G 3.2G 997G 1% /
none devtmpfs 1.0G 4.0K 1.0G 1% /dev
none tmpfs 1.0G 0 1.0G 0% /dev/shm
3,Unixbench跑分
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 02 2013 14:32:54 - 15:00:38
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19067872.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2940.9 MWIPS (8.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2782.6 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 699127.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 194736.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1309928.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1556785.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 107779.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7662.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3980.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 881.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1750950.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19067872.6 1633.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2940.9 534.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 2782.6 647.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 699127.0 1765.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 194736.6 1176.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1309928.4 2258.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1556785.4 1251.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 107779.6 269.4
Process Creation 126.0 7662.2 608.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3980.1 938.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 881.7 1469.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1750950.3 1167.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 989.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 02 2013 15:00:38 - 15:28:09
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 54216538.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8662.7 MWIPS (8.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7691.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 718649.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 189025.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2006923.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4449208.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 239263.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20286.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7936.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 825.3 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4414158.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 54216538.1 4645.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8662.7 1575.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 7691.5 1788.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 718649.4 1814.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 189025.6 1142.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2006923.4 3460.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4449208.5 3576.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 239263.9 598.2
Process Creation 126.0 20286.2 1610.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7936.3 1871.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 825.3 1375.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4414158.3 2942.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1916.1
备个案吧。。。。长痛不如短痛
其实最主要国内也没什么好点儿的商家,况且价格也奇高无比,想了想还是算了
此款vps没有任何性价比,不值得入手。
奇葩,你这个域名和博客还在。。。
哈哈哈,我了觉得日光早应该换个域名了。现在这个域名品相实在太差了……
求推荐一款性价比高的VPS,价格低,性能好的……新人想折腾下!
昨天刚刚入了害羞哥的傲游主机。现在国庆有四折活动,折合下来34块/月,双核512,Xen的,还行~